(英语语言学纲要 3页

  • 60.80 KB
  • 2022-08-11 发布

(英语语言学纲要

  • 3页
  • 当前文档由用户上传发布,收益归属用户
  1. 1、本文档由用户上传,淘文库整理发布,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、本文档内容版权归属内容提供方,所产生的收益全部归内容提供方所有。如果您对本文有版权争议,请立即联系网站客服。
  3. 3、本文档由用户上传,本站不保证质量和数量令人满意,可能有诸多瑕疵,付费之前,请仔细阅读内容确认后进行付费下载。
  4. 网站客服QQ:403074932
ComponentialAnalysisComponentialanalysisisamethodthatlooksateachwordasabundleofdifferentfeaturesorcomponents.Thefocusofcomponentialanalysisisonfindingthosefeaturesthatarenecessaryandsufficientforagivenitemtobeanexampleofagivenword.Forexample,thewordmancouldbeseenasthesumofthefeatures[+human],[+adult],[+male].Anyonewhohas11ofthesefeaturesqualifiesasaman.Similarly,thewordwomanwouldbedefinedas[+human],[+adult],[-male],thewordboyas[+human],[-adult],[+male],andthewordgirlas[+human].[-adult],[-male].(Notethatwritingfeaturesinbracketswiththesymbols“+”+and“-”isaconventionofcomponentialanalysis.)Incontrast,theworddogwouldbedefinedas[-human],[+/-adult],[+/-male].(The“+/-”symbolmeansthatitmaybelongtoeithergroupandstillbeadog.)Componentialanalysishelpsyoufindthosefeatureswhicharedistinctive,andwhichcreatedifferencesamongagroupofrelatedwords.Thefeaturesofthewordsgivenabovearesummarizedinthefollowingchart.HumanadultmaleBoy+-+Woman++-Girl+--Man__+++Dog-+/-+/-Componentialanalysiscanbeparticularlyusefulinhelpingtounderstandthesubtledifferencesinmeaningbetweenagroupofrelatedwords,asisshowninthefollowingchart:highpitchverbalvoicedhighvolumeScream+-/+++Shriek++-++Shout+/-+++Growl-+/-++/-Whispern/a+--Mumble-/+++-/+Babble+/--++/-Notes:+/-:primarilypositive;-/+:primarilynegative.Mostpeople,native-speakersandEnglishteachersincluded.wouldbehardpressedifsomeoneaskedthemtoexplainthedifferencebetweenthisgroupofwords.Butbydoingacomponentialanalysis,itbecomesquiteclearhowthesystemofEnglishvocabularydividesuptheworldofsuchverbalandnonverbalhumansounds.ComponentialanalysiscanbeofparticularbenefitwhenyouarecalledontotranslatetoorfromEnglish.ThewordheirinEnglish,forinstance,meansapersonwhohasreceived,orwillreceive,somethingofvalueaftersomeoneelsediedordies.Butinmanyothercultures,theuseofthetermclearlyimpliesthatthatotherpersonhasdiedalready.(WhataboutChinese?)Anotherstrengthofthismethodliesinitshandlingoffigurativelanguage.Figuresofspeechtendtobehighlyculture-bound.IfanEnglishspeakersaysthephrase“Heisadog”,theyareprobablycommentingontheperson’sgreedorselfishness,asthisisafeatureassociatedwithdogs.(Ontheotherhand,dogsare\nalsoseeninEnglishasverydetermined,soitispossiblethatthespeakermightbecomplimentingsomeone’sdedicationandhardwork,thoughthisislesscommon.)ButifthesamecomparisonismadeinChinese,thespeakerprobablymeanstocallthepersonasnoborbootlickersincedogsareseenassubmissiveandservile.TheChineselanguagealsohastheexpressionrunningdog,ofcourse,forcollaboratorsofdespoticrulers.Whilecallingsomeoneadogisinsultinginbothlanguages,theflavoroftheinsultisquitedifferent.Byanalyzingintensivefeaturesofthesourceandtargetitems,especiallythosethatarebeinghighlightedinthefigureofspeechathand,thetranslatorcangetafirmergriponthetextandcomeupwithabetterwayofcommunicatingtherealmeaningoftheoriginalutteranceoratleastavoidcreatingadistinctlywrongimpressionbybeingtooliteral.Inspiteofthestrengthsdiscussedabove,componentialanalysisisnotcompletelysatisfactoryfortheanalysisofmeaninginallsituations.Thefollowingarethreemajorlimitationsofcomponentialanalysis.1)Ittendstofocusexclusivelyondenotationandleaveouttheconnotation.Inthechartabove,forexample,shoutusuallyimpliesadegreeofurgency;growlcarrieswithitasenseofangeranddisapproval;whisperoneofsecrecy;andbabbleisassociatedwithbabies.Noneoftheseimportantshadesofmeaningarecapturedbythecomponentialanalysis.2)Componentialanalysisfocusesexclusivelyontypicalcases.Thechartabovecategoricallydefinesscreamingandshrieking,butwhataboutsomehigh-pitched,non-verbalnoisebetweenthetwo?Thewordrun,whendistinguishedfromwalk,jumpandhop,maybedefinedasmovingquicklyontwofeet,withnofootonthegroundforaninstantineachstep.Theanalysis,however,leavesoutthemeaningofrunasitisusedinsentencessuchasThecrabsarerunningaround.Thesnakeranacrossthelawn.Then,wemayalsofindcasesinwhichthereisnophysicalmovement:Herunstheoffice.Heisrunningforpresident.Thecarisrunning.Theroadrunsacrossthemountain.3)Itisoftendifficult,ifnotimpossible,todefineexactlywhatthenecessaryandsufficientfeaturesforagivenwordare.Theexamplesgivenabovearefairlyclear-cut,butpeoplewillnoteasilyagreeaboutwhatarethedefiningfeaturesofmoreabstractwordssuchasfreedom,democracy,socialismandcommunism.Inmanycases,peopleseemtoknowhowwordsdifferfromeachotherwithoutbeingabletodefinitelyidentifytheircomponents.Forexample,anattempttoclassifydifferentplantswillquicklyfallintohighlytechnicalbiologicalterminology,whichisnotpartoftheknowledge-baseofnativespeakerseventhoughtheyhavenotroubledistinguishinganorangetreefromalemontree01adaisyfromanorchid.Someoftheseweaknessesofcomponentialanalysiscanhoffsetbyturningtoamethodknownasprototypetheory.Here.aconceptisseennotasasetofcriticalfeatures,butratherintermsofamosttypicalinstanceor“prototype”.Theadvantageofiiiskindofanalysisisthatitallowsforcategorieswithfuzzyboundaries,ratherthanstrict,binaryplusesandminuses.Suchfuzzyboundariesare,inmostcases,probablymuchclosertothewayinwhichthehumanmindactuallystoreswordsandtheirassociatedconcepts.\nInprototypetheory,agivennoisecanbeviewednotsimplyeitherscreamingornotscreaming,butscreamingtoacertaindegree,dependingonhowsimilaritistothetypicalcaseofscreaming.Forthesametoken,awhaleisamammaltoacertaindegreeeventhoughthemostprototypicalmammalwouldbeonethatlivesondryland,hashair,andbreast-feedsitsyoung(e.g..ahuman,adogoramonkey).Whileswallowsandrobinsareamongthemosttypicalbirdsofall,chickensandturkeysarelessso,andostrichesandpenguinsareperhapsamongtheleasttypical.Anostrichorapenguinisstillabird,butitisnotatalltheimagethatcomestomindwhensomeonesaysthewordbirdbutgivesusnoadditionalinformation.Prototypetheoryisalsousefulinanalyzinggroupsofwordswhosemeaningscanoftenblendtogether,forexampleglass,cupandbowl.Thedifferencesbetweenthesethreewordsareonlyrelative,withnohardandfastboundaries.Wecandistinguishaprototypicalcupfromaprototypicalglassorbowlfairlyeasily.Foritemswhicharemadeoutofglassorceramicandwhoseshapeisindeterminate,however,wefindthatthewayinwhichpeoplechoosetonameitactuallydependsnotontheobjectitself,butonsuchfactorsaswhatitisbeingusedtoserve.Thus,asingleobjectmightbecalledacupwhenitholdstea,aglasswhenitholdswine,andabowlwhenitholdsicecream.(英语语言学纲要,丁言仁、郝克,上海外语教育出版社,2001,147-152.)

相关文档